smolanalytics
log inStart free
best · roundup

Best privacy-friendly analytics. A cookieless, honest roundup.

Six cookieless analytics tools worth running, ranked by the job they do best, with each one's privacy stance, self-host story, and cost stated plainly. No trashing, no invented flaws, and a straight answer on which to pick.

The best privacy-friendly analytics tools in 2026 are all cookieless, so they drop no tracking cookies and need no consent banner. Plausible and Fathom are the polished, lightweight web-analytics choices: a tiny script, a clean single dashboard, EU-hosted options, both open-source-friendly (Plausible is AGPL; Fathom is a paid cloud). Umami and GoatCounter are the lean self-host picks, both free and open-source, GoatCounter being the most minimal. Simple Analytics leans hardest on a no-personal-data promise and a hosted cloud. All five are web analytics only: no funnels, retention, or product events. smolanalytics is the pick if you want privacy plus product analytics from one snippet: a single MIT-licensed Go binary (no Kafka, ClickHouse, or Postgres) that is cookieless, first-party, and self-hostable, does web and product analytics (funnels, retention, paths, cohorts), gives a daily verdict on what to fix, and lets you ask your numbers in plain English with answers computed from deterministic reports, guarded by a CI test, never guessed.
the short version

How to choose in one line

  • ·Want privacy plus product analytics from one snippet? smolanalytics: cookieless and self-hostable, with funnels, a verdict, and answers computed not guessed.
  • ·Want polished cookieless web analytics you can self-host? Plausible: clean dashboard, tiny script, AGPL.
  • ·Want a simple hosted product, no server to run? Fathom or Simple Analytics: strong privacy stance, set and forget.
  • ·Want a lean, free, open-source self-host? Umami, or GoatCounter at its most minimal.
the list

The tools, ranked by what they are best for

Ranked for the specific reader this page serves: someone who wants private, cookieless analytics they can trust and, ideally, own. If your priority is a different job (say, the absolute simplest hosted counter), the order would shift, and the tradeoffs below say exactly when it should.

  1. 1smolanalyticscookieless · first-party · web + productself-host free (MIT) · cloud from $9/mo

    Best for: Best if you want privacy and product analytics from one snippet. Cookieless with no consent banner, first-party, and self-hostable as a single Go binary. Does web analytics (visitors, referrers, UTM) and product analytics (funnels, retention, paths, cohorts), plus a daily verdict on what to fix and a plain-English ask surface where answers are computed, not guessed.

    Tradeoff: It deliberately does not do session replay, feature flags, experiments, heatmaps, or surveys. If pure, ultra-minimal web analytics is all you want, Fathom or GoatCounter are simpler. It is a young, one-person project.

  2. 2Plausiblepolished cookieless web analyticscloud from ~$9/mo · self-host free (AGPL)

    Best for: Best polished, open-source, privacy-first web analytics. Cookieless by default, no consent banner, a clean single-page dashboard, EU-hosted cloud, and a script that is a fraction of a kilobyte. Easy to self-host with its Docker setup.

    Tradeoff: Web analytics only: not built for product events, funnels, retention, or cohorts. Self-hosting runs on Elixir with ClickHouse and Postgres behind it.

  3. 3Fathom Analyticssimple cookieless, hostedcloud from ~$15/mo · no self-host

    Best for: Best simple, hosted cookieless web analytics with a strong privacy stance. No cookies, no consent banner needed, EU isolation options, and a famously fast, uncluttered dashboard. Set-and-forget for a marketing site.

    Tradeoff: It is a paid hosted product, not open-source and not self-hostable. Web analytics only: no product funnels, retention, or cohorts.

  4. 4Umamilean self-hosted, open-sourceself-host free (MIT) · cloud tier available

    Best for: Best lean self-hosted, open-source web analytics. Privacy-friendly, cookieless, a tidy dashboard, and a very small footprint. A popular free swap for Google Analytics on a marketing site, with a hosted cloud if you prefer.

    Tradeoff: Web-first: event tracking is basic, and there are no real product funnels, retention, or cohorts. Self-hosting needs a Postgres or MySQL database alongside it.

  5. 5Simple Analyticsno-personal-data, hostedcloud from ~$9/mo · no self-host

    Best for: Best for a hard no-personal-data promise on a hosted cloud. Cookieless, no consent banner, EU-based, and marketed on collecting no personal data at all. A clean, privacy-forward dashboard.

    Tradeoff: A paid hosted product, not open-source or self-hostable. Web analytics only, with events but no product funnels, retention, or cohorts.

  6. 6GoatCounterminimal, free, open-sourcefree (open-source) · free hosted tier

    Best for: Best truly minimal, free, open-source web analytics. Cookieless, no personal data, a tiny footprint, and a free hosted tier for non-commercial and small sites. Self-hosts as a single Go binary too.

    Tradeoff: Deliberately spartan: basic reports only, no product analytics, and the free hosted tier is aimed at small or non-commercial sites. It is a small, community project.

side by side

How they compare at a glance

toolcookielessself-hostweb + productcost
smolanalyticsyes, no bannerone Go binary, no DBbothfree self-host · $9+/mo cloud
Plausibleyes, no bannerElixir + ClickHouse + PGweb onlyfree self-host · ~$9+/mo cloud
Fathomyes, no bannerhosted onlyweb only~$15+/mo cloud
Umamiyes, no bannerapp + Postgres/MySQLweb-firstfree self-host · cloud tier
Simple Analyticsyes, no bannerhosted onlyweb only~$9+/mo cloud
GoatCounteryes, no bannerone Go binaryweb onlyfree · free hosted tier

Self-host footprints are the typical documented stacks; each project's cloud hides all of it for you. Cloud prices are entry tiers that scale with traffic, so check the current pricing pages before you commit.

the honest pick, and its limits

Where smolanalytics fits, and where it does not

smolanalytics is a single MIT-licensed Go binary, stdlib only, roughly 7 bytes per event, with no Kafka, ClickHouse, or Postgres to run beside it. It is cookieless with no consent banner, first-party, and self-hostable, so it keeps every privacy property the tools above are chosen for. From one snippet you get web analytics (visitors, referrers, UTM) and product analytics (funnels, retention, paths, cohorts), plus a verdict that tells you what to fix on the dashboard and in a morning brief.

The wedge is the ask surface. You ask in plain English from a dashboard bar, or from your own Cursor or Claude over MCP (47 tools, 13 prompts), and the answer is computed from the same deterministic reports the dashboard renders, never generated by an LLM. A CI agreement test fails the build if the editor's answer ever differs from the dashboard's, so a number can't be hallucinated. You bring your own AI model, so the AI part is free. Importers from PostHog, Umami, CSV, and JSONL mean switching is a copy, not a rebuild.

The honest limit: it deliberately does not do session replay, feature flags, experiments, heatmaps, or surveys, and if all you want is the absolute simplest hosted counter, Fathom or GoatCounter are simpler. It is also a young project built by one person. Pick smolanalytics when what you want is private analytics you own that can also answer product questions, straight and cheaply.

try it in 30 seconds
docker run -p 8080:8080 ghcr.io/arjun0606/smolanalytics

Common questions

What is the best privacy-friendly analytics tool?
There is no single winner, because the tools serve slightly different needs. For polished cookieless web analytics you can self-host, Plausible. For a simple hosted product with a strong privacy stance, Fathom or Simple Analytics. For a lean open-source self-host, Umami or, at its most minimal, GoatCounter. smolanalytics is the pick if you want privacy plus product analytics from one snippet: cookieless, first-party, self-hostable as a single Go binary, with funnels and retention, a daily verdict on what to fix, and a plain-English ask surface whose answers are computed, not guessed.
What is cookieless analytics, and do these tools need a consent banner?
Cookieless analytics measures traffic without storing tracking cookies on a visitor's device, usually by counting from server-side signals instead. Because no cookies are set and no personal data is stored to identify people, these tools generally do not require a cookie-consent banner. Every tool on this page (smolanalytics, Plausible, Fathom, Umami, Simple Analytics, GoatCounter) is cookieless by design. See the glossary entry on cookieless analytics for the full definition.
Which privacy-friendly analytics can I self-host?
smolanalytics, Plausible, Umami, and GoatCounter are self-hostable. smolanalytics is the lightest: one static MIT-licensed Go binary with no Kafka, ClickHouse, or Postgres beside it, so docker run has it up in about 30 seconds. GoatCounter is also a single Go binary. Plausible (Elixir + ClickHouse + Postgres) and Umami (app + a database) are heavier. Fathom and Simple Analytics are hosted-only and cannot be self-hosted.
Which of these also does product analytics, not just web analytics?
Only smolanalytics. Plausible, Fathom, Umami, Simple Analytics, and GoatCounter are all web analytics: visitors, referrers, top pages, and (for some) basic events, but no funnels, retention, paths, or cohorts. smolanalytics does web and product analytics from one snippet and one binary, and adds a plain-English ask surface and a verdict, while deliberately skipping session replay, feature flags, and experiments.
How much do these cost?
The open-source tools are free to self-host: smolanalytics and Umami are MIT, Plausible is AGPL, GoatCounter is open-source. Hosted clouds vary: Plausible, Simple Analytics, and Umami start around $9 per month, Fathom around $15. smolanalytics self-host is free forever (MIT); its cloud is a 14-day full trial with no card, then Solo $9, Pro $29, Scale $149, or Business $499 per month, with $5 per extra million events, which is well under the roughly $50 the big tools charge for overage.
What makes smolanalytics different from the other privacy tools?
It keeps the privacy properties (cookieless, no consent banner, first-party, self-hostable) but adds product analytics and an ask surface. You ask in plain English from a dashboard bar or from your own Cursor or Claude over MCP (47 tools, 13 prompts), and the answer is computed from the same deterministic reports the dashboard renders, never generated by an LLM. A CI agreement test fails the build if the editor's answer ever differs from the dashboard's, so a number can't be hallucinated. Because you bring your own AI model, the AI part costs nothing.
Start the 14-day trial
no credit card · or self-host free forever

keep reading

vs GA4
cookieless and first-party, no consent banner
cookieless analytics
what it means, and why no banner
security
how the data is handled
every feature
what the binary actually does