switch in minutes · keep your data

Outgrowing Plausible?

Plausible is lovely — private, light, trustworthy. It's also web analytics only: funnels sit on higher tiers, and there's no retention, no paths, no asking from your editor. smolanalytics keeps the privacy values and adds the product analytics — one binary, $9 for unlimited sites.

smolanalytics vs Plausible in one paragraph

smolanalytics and Plausible are both privacy-first, open-source, cookieless alternatives to Google Analytics; the difference is scope. Plausible is web analytics only — pageviews, sources, goals — with funnels, custom properties, and the Stats API reserved for higher tiers; as of mid-2026 its cloud starts around $9/month for 10,000 pageviews on one site, and it has no retention cohorts or user-path analysis. smolanalytics is web and product analytics in one MIT-licensed Go binary: funnels, retention, paths, and cohorts on every plan, a daily verdict that says what to fix, Google Search Console built in, and ask-in-editor via MCP with a CI test that keeps editor answers identical to the dashboard. Self-hosting is free with no database to run; cloud is $9/month (Solo) with unlimited sites and 250k events after a 14-day full trial. Pick Plausible for the most battle-tested privacy brand; pick smolanalytics when you also need product analytics.

where Plausible stops (as of mid-2026)

Funnels, custom properties, and the Stats API are reserved for higher tiers — the ~$9 Starter plan is web analytics on one site, capped at 10k pageviews.

plausible.io pricing, as of mid-2026

No retention cohorts and no user paths: Plausible is deliberately web-only, so product questions need a second tool.

Plausible feature set, as of mid-2026

There's no editor-native way to ask your numbers a question — reading the dashboard is the interface.

Plausible feature set, as of mid-2026

Plausible vs smolanalytics

Plausiblesmolanalytics
Scopeweb analytics onlyweb + product analytics
Funnels / retention / pathsfunnels on higher tiers; no retention/pathsall included, every plan
Entry cloud price~$9 · 10k pageviews · 1 site$9 · 250k events · unlimited sites
Self-hostCommunity Edition (multi-service)one Go binary, no database
Ask in your editornot offeredMCP — 43 tools, CI-checked answers
Tells you what to fixdashboards you reada verdict, every morning
Privacycookieless, no bannercookieless mode, no banner

when to pick Plausible instead

Swap in two minutes

<!-- remove the Plausible <script> tag, drop this in -->
<script src="https://YOUR-INSTANCE/sdk.js"></script>
<script>smolanalytics.init("YOUR_WRITE_KEY", { host: "https://YOUR-INSTANCE" });</script>
<!-- cookieless mode stays on. same privacy, plus funnels/retention/paths. -->

Same privacy values, one snippet. You keep the no-banner setup and gain the product analytics Plausible doesn't do.

questions

Is smolanalytics a good Plausible alternative?

Yes, if you like Plausible's privacy values but need more than web analytics. smolanalytics is open source (MIT), cookieless, and self-hostable as a single Go binary — and it adds funnels, retention, paths, cohorts, a daily verdict, and ask-in-editor via MCP. Cloud is $9/month (Solo) with unlimited sites and 250k events after a 14-day full trial.

What does smolanalytics include that Plausible doesn't?

Product analytics depth on every plan: funnels, retention cohorts, and user paths (as of mid-2026, Plausible paywalls funnels to higher tiers and offers no retention or path analysis). Plus a daily verdict that tells you what to fix, and editor-native answers over MCP with a CI agreement test that keeps them equal to the dashboard.

When is Plausible the better choice?

When you want the most battle-tested privacy-analytics brand and only need web analytics. Plausible has been the reference cookieless tool for years; if pageviews, sources, and goals are the whole job, it's an excellent pick.

Get the verdict, not another dashboard.

Drop one snippet, ask in your editor, own your data. 14-day full trial, no credit card.